Penalties and the Problem of Random Win or Loss: When Lottery Decides the Fate of Champions

Imagine: one hundred and twenty minutes of intense struggle, millions of fans in front of screens, players giving their all, and it all comes down to a few seconds when one person sprints and kicks the ball from the eleven-meter mark. Penalty. For some, it's a chance to become a hero, for others, a tragedy that haunts them for life. But how fair is this method of determining the winner? Is the penalty shootout a lottery that destroys the meaning of the game? Or is it the highest manifestation of psychological resilience and sportsmanship? Debates on this topic have not subsided for decades, and each new tournament adds new arguments to them.

Historical Overview: How Penalties Became the Weapon of Fate

Until the 1970s, draws in the playoffs were replayed, and sometimes a draw determined the fate of finalists. But in 1970, FIFA first introduced penalty shootouts at the World Cup. The first drama occurred in 1982 when West Germany defeated France in the semi-finals. Since then, penalties have become an integral part of big football. They have determined the winners of the Champions League, the World Cup, and the European Championship. And every time they raise the same questions: why does the outcome of such an important match depend on a series of shots where the element of chance plays a huge role?

History remembers loud cases when the best teams of the tournament were eliminated due to one unlucky penalty. Italy lost to Brazil in 1994 in the final when Roberto Baggio sent the ball into the sky. England has suffered from the "penalty curse" for decades, losing in decisive series. These episodes have entered football folklore and become part of national traumas. But they also sparked a discussion about how much chance determines the result.

Chance or Skill: What Do Statistics Say

Many experts claim that penalties are not a roulette, but an art based on technique, psychology, and preparation. Success depends on how calm the kicker is, how well he reads the goalkeeper, and how he controls his fear. However, statistics say otherwise. Studies show that on average about 75% of penalties are scored, and this number has been quite stable over the decades. At the same time, the difference between the best and worst performers is not as great as one might expect. Chance factors such as weather, field condition, player fatigue, and crowd pressure all contribute, making the series resemble a lottery.

However, there is another view: in penalty shootouts, the character of the team, its psychological resilience, is revealed. Teams that handle pressure have an advantage. For example, Germany and Brazil are traditionally strong in these series because their training culture includes special penalty training and psychological work. However, even they have setbacks. Therefore, it cannot be said that it is entirely random, but the element of uncertainty remains high.

Psychological Factor: When Reason Is Stronger Than Technique

Players admit that penalties are the biggest psychological test in their careers. One shot can make you a hero or an outcast for life. Even the most technically skilled footballers sometimes cannot cope with the excitement. Remember the 2008 Champions League final when John Terry slipped at the decisive moment, or the 2022 World Cup final where Kylian Mbappé scored three penalties but his team still lost. These moments show that even with perfect technique, the fate of the shot often depends on the state of the nervous system.

Psychologists note that in penalty shootouts, it is more important to disconnect emotions and focus on a simple action than physical form. Those who can do this more often become heroes. That's why coaches sometimes choose not the most star players for penalties, but those who have psychological resilience. However, even they are not immune to chance: the ball may hit the crossbar, the goalkeeper may guess the direction, and the entire calculation falls apart.

Alternatives to Penalties: What Has Been and Is Being Proposed

Due to dissatisfaction with the randomness of penalties, experts and fans have repeatedly proposed alternatives. For example, conducting additional time until the "golden goal" — when the team that scores first wins immediately. However, this rule was abolished because it led to too cautious play. Also, it was proposed to increase the number of substitutions in extra time or even hold repeat matches. But all these options have their drawbacks: they overload players, complicate the calendar, or do not solve the problem of a draw.

One of the most discussed ideas is the format of "American penalties" — when the player starts from the center of the field and must circle the goalkeeper or score into an empty net. This is more exciting and requires more skill than the standard shot from the spot. However, this format has not yet received FIFA's support. Also, it was proposed to change the distance to the goal or limit the time for preparation for the shot. But all these ideas remain theory.

Ethical Aspect: Is It Fair to Determine the Winner by Lottery

The main question that arises when discussing penalties is fairness. A team may dominate for 120 minutes, create many opportunities, but lose in a series of shots. Is such an outcome fair? Opponents of penalties claim that this is a profanation of the idea of sport, where the strongest wins. Supporters, however, say that the ability to score penalties is also part of the game, and the team that is better prepared in this component deserves to win.

Moreover, penalties create inequality: the goalkeeper has fewer chances than the kicker, but his role in the series can be decisive. A good goalkeeper often becomes a hero, and his team gets an advantage. But overall, the penalty shootout is still a lottery where luck plays too big a role. And this does not satisfy many football romantics who want to see a more logical and understandable way to determine the winner.

Known Cases When Penalties Decided Everything

The 1994 World Cup final — Brazil and Italy. Roberto Baggio, one of the best players in the world, sends the ball into the sky, and Brazil becomes the champion. The 2008 Champions League final — Manchester United and Chelsea. John Terry slips and does not score, and his team loses. The 2020 European Championship — England loses to Italy in the final, and the trophy goes to the opponents. These moments remain in history not only as sporting events but also as human dramas. They show that penalties are not just a technical element but a moment that determines the fates of players, coaches, and entire nations.

What to Do: Possible Reforms and Their Consequences

Some football federations have already experimented with changes. For example, in some tournaments, the rule has been introduced that in penalty shootouts, players shoot in turn, but if one team scores and the other does not, it loses. This makes the series more tense, but does not solve the problem of chance. Also, it was proposed to limit the time for preparation for penalties to reduce psychological pressure, but this may lead to even greater haste and mistakes.

Perhaps the best solution will be a combination of factors: increasing extra time, using technology for accurate penalty determination, and finally, creating a more balanced scoring system. But while FIFA and UEFA maintain the traditional format, and we continue to witness dramas at the eleven-meter mark.

Conclusion

Penalties are an integral part of football culture that combines skill and chance. They may be unfair, but they also create moments that are remembered for a lifetime. Without them, football would lose some of its charm. But the problem of chance remains, and it will be discussed as long as there are tournaments that end with a series of shots. Perhaps in the future, new formats will emerge that make the determination of the winner more logical. But for now, we enjoy these dramas because they make football what it is — unpredictable, emotional, and wonderful.

Permanent link to this publication: